How much should we believe mass media in general? Looking historically, they all run to tell us what will happen next only to be disappointed because we often realize this eventually didn’t happen or even if it did, it was only here and there that they get it right. Why is that? Well, journalism is not what it used to be, I guess. Instead of having investigative journalism we are now consistently bombarded by populist gossiping shy of any objectivity. So why am I talking about this? Because I recently read one such bombastic headline in one of the popular UK newspapers stating that house prices are set to soar by at least 20%. Apparently they are not making it up because this is according to property experts, and they are claiming extremely low interest rates, cheap mortgages and a shortage of supply are to be blamed. Fine, but let me tell you why I simply do not believe them.
Interest rates
First, let’s take a look at low interest rates. We all know western governments have pumped hundreds of billions of dollars into their economies to ease the pain from the financial meltdown. Quantitative easing is the main method they are using yet we haven’t seen any serious inflationary pressures that would normally result from printing huge amounts of money. Why is that? The main reason for the lack of inflation lies in the so called production capacity utilization. In the past two decades the world has seen an unprecedented growth in China, India and some other emerging economies. The end result of this growth is that the world economies are now capable of producing much more than ever before leading to an enormous spare production capacity. Huge factories all over the world but particularly in China lay empty waiting for new orders. The Federal Reserves statistics show that in the US alone production capacity utilization in 2009 stands at 70.1% and is at its lowest since the start of the data series in 1988. In Canada the use of capacity in 2009 stands at 67.4%, also the lowest since the records began. China’s excessive capacity on the other hand is staggering with capacity utilization rates of just 76% for steel, 75% for cement and 73% for aluminum in 2008 when demand was at its highest for years.
So, what do these figures tell us? Well, it’s rather simple really. As long as the world has to deal with such a huge excessive capacity we will not see the inflationary pressures. That is why the western governments are so eager to pump the money into their respective economies. However, we are in 2010 now and industrial production is showing signs of recovery leading to higher than expected inflation. On the other hand, empty factories are rarely properly maintained and become quickly obsolete so the total capacity is now in decline, which will push the capacity utilization rates even higher. As a result inflationary pressures will soon become a major problem of the healing world economy and governments will have to respond by raising interest rates. How high will they go? Who knows, perhaps we may come back to rates above 10%!
Cheap mortgages
Mortgages are not cheap, period. While a typical bank in the UK for instance may offer a 4.5% mortgage you have to keep in mind that the Bank of England (BoE) base rate is just 0.5% which is NINE TIMES lower. In 2007 BoE base rate was 5.75% at its highest but the rates you got from your high street banks were only slightly higher. That to me makes mortgages comparatively more expensive to say the least and considering huge losses banks are yet to recover, it is ludicrous to expect mortgage rates will stay as they are in case BoE increases the base rate. Believe me, current mortgage rates will increase alongside increases of the base rate because banks need our cash. Then again, did you know that there is no upper limit for mortgage and loan rates? Banks can effectively increase their rates as much as they like. To illustrate, an increase from 4.5% to say 6% would add roughly 30% to your monthly installment. Figures may look ‘small’ but it is the rate of change that matters and in our simple example this change from 4.5% to 6% represents a 33% jump. Honestly, how many people would be able to bear such increases?
Shortage of supply
To relate the discussion to my previous point, Buy-To-Let (BTL) will be the most affected part of the housing market. Any significant increases in the base rate will literally wipe out a large portion of the BTL market. Why? BTL market profitability depends on rents and these have been stagnating for quite some years now. In fact, in many places across the UK rents are still in decline because there is a surplus of properties to let. Low interest rates are therefore the only major factor that has prevented a massive default of the mortgage-intensive BTL market. Most of the BTL owners have taken out mortgages to fund their ventures and for years they were relying on low interest rates and high rent yields. Circumstances have obviously deteriorated and just small increases of the base rate will force BTL ‘owners’ relying on mortgages to sell as soon as possible because they will not be able to bear the additional costs without increasing the rents. Of course, they cannot do this because the tenants cannot afford to pay higher rents and because there is a surplus of available properties. So in essence, the current status-quo in the BTL market conceals the real supply which will be unleashed as soon as the mortgage rates increase. We will then witness an enormous surplus of supply which will lead to the second stage of the house price decline we are witnessing at the moment. This is not going to be a crash but rather a very slow and persistent decline. Another evidence of this comes from housebuilders. House prices are still way above the long-term average and normally it would make a perfect business case to build as much as possible yet housebuilders activity is at its lowest since the WWII. Why is that? Well, they are cautious because they are aware of the simmering BTL problem. They do not want to build now because building is resource intensive process up front while profits are only generated once you sell a house several years down the line. In effect, if a housebuilder starts with a new development in 2010 they will not see any money in their coffers for at least a year or even longer and God knows what will happen with the BTL market during that time. It may easily implode releasing a tsunami of new supply to the market crashing the prices and badly affecting housebuilders’ sales. In such a scenario housebuilders will not only face decreasing income from sales but also increased costs for marketing. Consequences could be devastating and witnessing the first wave of decline they are certainly not prepared to burn their fingers any time soon again. It is simply less risky not to build anything at all than commit resources up front for something that may not even sell a year or so from now.
Some people argue that maintaining the status quo for years to come may actually alleviate the problem. This would be possible if the government would have an unlimited supply of money for at least 10 or 15 more years. Yes, the reality is different as we do not live in Alice’s wonderland and no matter which party wins the UK election today, it is imperative that they bring the public finances back to normal as soon as possible. Cuts are inevitable and will be felt over many years ending the status quo and driving a large portion of the BTL market out of business. House prices will steadily decline below the long-term average and stay there for some time before climbing back again. Will we get rid of boom and bust economic cycles? I don’t think anyone can promise that but in complex systems things need to decline before they are booming again and so on.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.